Policing.uk
Police complaint vs civil claim
Police complaint (IOPC process) versus Civil claim (litigation)
A person aggrieved by police conduct can pursue a formal complaint through the IOPC process or bring a civil claim in the courts. The two routes serve different purposes, apply different standards, and produce different outcomes.
Side by side
| Police complaint (IOPC process) | Civil claim (litigation) | |
|---|---|---|
| Who investigates | The force's professional standards department (PSD) in the first instance. The IOPC (Independent Office for Police Conduct) oversees, and may direct or independently investigate serious matters | The claimant's solicitors investigate and gather evidence. An independent expert may be instructed. The case is determined by a judge (or jury in limited cases) |
| Standard of proof | Misconduct: balance of probabilities. Gross misconduct: balance of probabilities but the seriousness of the allegation is taken into account | Civil standard: balance of probabilities. The claimant must prove that the police conduct was unlawful on the balance of probabilities |
| Remedies | Outcomes include management action, written warning, final written warning, or dismissal. An apology may be offered. Compensation is not available through the complaints process | Damages (compensatory and, in exceptional cases, exemplary). Declarations of unlawful conduct. Injunctions. The court may award substantial sums |
| Time limits | Complaints should normally be made within 12 months of the incident. The force may exercise discretion to accept late complaints | Limitation period: generally 6 years for trespass to the person (assault, false imprisonment) and 3 years for personal injury claims, from the date of the incident |
| Legal representation needed | Not required. The complainant can submit and pursue a complaint without legal assistance. Advocacy support is available from some charities | Strongly recommended. Civil claims against the police involve complex law and procedure. Many solicitors act on a conditional fee (no win, no fee) basis |
| Outcome types | Upheld or not upheld. If upheld, action against the officer ranges from reflective practice to dismissal. No criminal sanctions unless referred for prosecution | Judgment or settlement. If successful, the claimant receives financial compensation. A judgment may also establish that police conduct was unlawful |
| Cost to complainant | Free. There is no cost to make or pursue a police complaint through the force or the IOPC | Potentially significant unless acting under a conditional fee agreement. The claimant may be liable for the defendant's costs if the claim fails |
| Public interest | Complaint outcomes contribute to force learning, policy change, and public accountability. IOPC publishes investigation reports on serious matters | Civil judgments create legal precedent. High-profile cases may attract media attention and public scrutiny. Settlements are often confidential |
Which applies
The two routes are not mutually exclusive: a person may pursue both a complaint and a civil claim arising from the same incident. The complaint process is free and can lead to officer discipline, but it does not provide compensation. A civil claim can result in financial damages but involves cost and risk. Specialist solicitors and organisations such as Inquest, Liberty, and the Police Action Centre can advise on the appropriate route.
Last updated 24 September 2026